Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Preparation and Optimization of Esomeprazole Nanosuspension using Evaporative Precipitation-Ultrasonication

Vijay Agarwal1,2 , Meenakshi Bajpai3

1Department of Pharmacy, NIMS University, Shobha Nagar, Delhi highway, Jaipur, Rajasthan; 2College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajkumar Goel Instutute of Technology, Delhi Meerut Road, Ghaziabad (U.P.); 3Department of Pharmacy, Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

For correspondence:-  Vijay Agarwal   Email: vagarwal5@rediffmail.com   Tel:+919891383464

Received: 4 April 2013        Accepted: 23 February 2014        Published: 23 April 2014

Citation: Agarwal V, Bajpai M. Preparation and Optimization of Esomeprazole Nanosuspension using Evaporative Precipitation-Ultrasonication. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(4):497-503 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i4.2

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To prepare and optimize esomeprazole nanosuspension to enhance drug dissolution rate.
Methods: Esomeprazole nanosuspensions were prepared by evaporative precipitation-ultrasonication method using F68 (Poloxamer 188) and F127 (Poloxamer 407) as stabilizers. Formulation and process variables (concentration of stabilizers and drug, power input and duration of ultrasonication) affecting the characteristics of nanosuspensions were optimized. The nanosuspensions were characterized for particle size, shape, zeta potential, stability and in vitro drug release study.
Results: For optimization of esomeprazole nanosuspension, the effect of some important parameters, including concentration of F68, concentration of esomeprazole, precipitation temperature, duration of ultrasonication and power input, on particle size were investigated, and the optimal values were 0.4% w/v, 3.5 mg/ml, 4oC, 20 min and 60% W, respectively. Particle size was in the range of 125 - 184 nm with good zeta potential (15.9 - 25.5 mV). In vitro dissolution rate of esomeprazole was enhanced 4-fold (100% in 60 min) compared with crude esomeprazole (24% in 60 min), and this was due to decrease in particle size. The stability results indicate that nanoformulations stored at 4oC for two months showed maximum stability.
Conclusion: The results indicate the suitability of evaporative-precipitation-ultrasonication method for preparation of nanosuspensions of poorly soluble drugs with improved in vitro dissolution rate, thus potentially capable of enhancing fast onset of therapeutic activity, and bioavailability.

Keywords: Agglomeration, Esomeprazole, Ultrasonification, Nanosuspension, Drug release, Solubility, Stability

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates